Thursday, 14 February 2013

Don't Leave It Too Late To Make Your Will


 
Sir Peter Ustinov's estate may be lost on legal fees in bitter feud

The feuding family of late great actor Sir Peter Ustinov may have lost his entire estate to the lawyers, it was claimed today, as their nine-year battle over his money continues.

Sir Peter Ustinov's estate may be lost on legal fees in bitter feud
The double Oscar-winner passed away in 2004 aged 82 Photo: Reuters
The celebrated actor, director and raconteur - who was married three times and had four children - wrote his last will 36 years before his death, which has led judges to rule he died intestate.
 
The double Oscar-winner, one of Britain's most respected actors who starred in films including Spartacus, Death on the Nile and Logan's Run, passed away in 2004 aged 82. It is estimated that at the time he would have been worth tens of millions.
 
But the fight over his estate continues as Igor Cloutier von Ustinov, his son by his second wife, brought proceedings to London’s High Court in a bid to freeze out his stepmother Lady Helene Ustinov.
 
The sculptor is seeking to prove that trusts set up by his father mean his estate should be handed to his offspring in spite of the ruling by Swiss judges which revoked the will.
 
After the hearing, in which Mrs Justice Proudman reserved judgement, Sir Peter’s son-in-law said that there is little left to fight for. 
 
Malcolm Rennie, who is married to the actor’s daughter Tamara Ustinov Rennie, said outside court: "Peter was a wonderful man and I loved him very much as a son-in-law, but being successful at such a high level as he was, everybody wanted a piece of him.
 
"He was an actor, writer, raconteur and UNICEF ambassador, criss-crossing the globe daily, and, because of that, he was not able to be the present father that he would have liked to have been to his children and he tried to compensate by trying to provide his children with material things".
 
He added: "I would be surprised if there is anything left in the estate - it has probably all gone to the lawyers."
 
The battle over the estate is still ongoing in the Swiss courts, more than five years after they ruled that the June 1972 marriage of Sir Peter and Lady Helene made his previous will – written in 1968 and amended by a codicil in 1970 – invalid.
 
The judgement paved the way for her to lay claim to a share of his estate, which includes the rights to his works, and property in Switzerland where he lived at the time of his death.
 
But his son now claims that trusts his father had set up separated off a “sizeable” slice of Sir Peter’s assets for his children.
 
Ian Meakin, for Mr von Ustinov, said that "overarching" lifetime trusts set up by Sir Peter put valuable "intellectual property rights" in his work out of reach of his widow, and into the hands of his children alone.
 
He argued the alleged trusts, governed by English law, had survived the revocation of the will and ought now to pass to him and his sisters as his father wanted.
 
Sir Peter's other three children - his daughters Mrs Ustinov Rennie, Andrea Ustinov and Pavla Ustinov - have all been involved in the legal battle.
 
Mrs Rennie, an actress, is said to want the matter decided in the Swiss courts Stephen Midwinter, for Ryan Rudolph and Peter Hafter, two retired Swiss lawyers whom Mr von Ustinov claims are the trustees, denied that the trusts even existed.

 
------------------------------------------------------
 
Making a will is one of the things that we often overlook due to busy lifestyles.
Don’t leave it too late!
 
In 2011 a survey revealed that 70% of Britons have not made a will. Two thirds (65%) said they have not even discussed the subject with close friends or family.
 
For peace of mind now and the security of your loved ones in the future, contact your local, family law firm.
 
Our experienced lawyers will explain and guide you through the process of recording your wishes and protecting your assets for the benefit of your loved ones or chosen charities.
 
We are currently offering a half price wills service
Single ~ £75 + VAT
Couple ~ £125 + VAT
 
Please contact Anne Norton
 
Hadgkiss Hughes and Beale
83 Alcester Road, Moseley, Birmingham B13 8EB
0121 449 5050

 
 


Monday, 28 January 2013

Danny Major - Police to Review Evidence


==========================
==========================
 

Justice for Danny Major
 

This message from 'INNOCENT' Manchester-based organisation which supports and campaigns for innocent people in prison in the UK.
 
Danny Major a police officer was jailed for the assault of a teenage prisoner after West Yorks colleagues testified against him. He was jailed for 15 months in 2006 when he was convicted, at a retrial, of assaulting a drunken teenager Bridewell police station in Leeds on 6 September 2003. He has always protested his innocence, claiming that senior officers were reluctant to delve into his case because of fears of damaging the reputation of the force. He and his father, a retired policeman, have been campaigning since his conviction for it to be overturned.
 
 

 

***********************************************

Police force accused of a cover-up faces corruption inquiry

 
 
The policing watchdog has ordered an independent inquiry into claims of corruption at West Yorkshire Police.

The force was accused yesterday of a "cover-up" in the case of Danny Major , an officer who was jailed for the assault of a teenage prisoner after colleagues testified against him.

Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary (HMIC) is to appoint an independent force to scrutinise claims that the original investigation was tainted and ended in an unsafe conviction.

Mark Burns-Williamson, West Yorkshire's Police and Crime Commissioner, referred the case after allegations that officers' testimonies were unreliable and that key evidence, including CCTV footage, was withheld from the defence.

Mr Major, 34, was jailed for 15 months in 2006 when he was convicted, at a retrial, of assaulting a drunken teenager whom he was trying to arrest. He has always protested his innocence, claiming that senior officers were reluctant to delve into his case because of fears of damaging the reputation of the force. He and his father, a retired policeman, have been campaigning since his conviction for it to be overturned.

The new investigation is the latest controversy for West Yorkshire Police, which is also facing an inquiry over its officers' friendships with Jimmy Savile, the late BBC presenter and serial sex offender. In October, Sir Norman Bettison resigned as Chief Constable before a police authority meeting that was to consider suspending him over his role in the police handling of the Hillsborough disaster.

Mr Major told The Times: "West Yorkshire Police have spent nearly ten years avoiding the truth and trying to cover it up. I just want to get to the bottom of it."

He served four months in prison and lost his job after he was convicted of assaulting the drunken teenager, who was arrested and taken to Bridewell police station in Leeds on September 6 2003.

Neil Wilby, a journalist who has campaigned for the conviction to be overturned, claimed that the force was reluctant to investigate the case out of fear that "bad practice" would be exposed. 
 
"I believe the independent investigation will expose fundamental flaws," he said. Mr Burns-Williamson met the Major family this month before confirming that he would seek an independent review. A West Yorkshire Police spokeswoman said: "We're aware of the referral to HMIC and it would be inappropriate to comment any further at this stage."
  
End of Bulletin